Cheap but powerful
#34 Gemini 2.5 Flash • #37 Gemini 2.0 Flash • #31 GPT‑4o (Mar ’25)
Rankings • 2025
We tested dozens of AI models under one clear system. This chapter shares ranks 26–49 with context size, score, price, speed, and where each one fits.
In 2025, there are hundreds of AI language models. Many claim to be the best, which makes real choices harder. This series cuts through noise with one test setup so you can compare models fairly.
We split the results into three parts to make decisions easier:
This page covers Part 1: ranks 26–49. They won’t always make headlines, but they keep products moving.
We used the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v2.2 to score each model out of 100. Weighting:
We also consider real‑world signals: price, speed, context window, and reliability. That shows not just knowledge but day‑to‑day usefulness.
#34 Gemini 2.5 Flash • #37 Gemini 2.0 Flash • #31 GPT‑4o (Mar ’25)
#42 Gemini 1.5 Pro (2M tokens) • #45 Llama 4 Scout (10M tokens)
#40 DeepSeek V3 (Dec ’24) • #30 Llama 4 Maverick
#44 Perplexity Sonar • #46 Sonar Pro • #29 Grok 3
Balanced model with strong multimodal skills.
Best for: creative writing, business tasks, and analysis with big memory.
Early “thinking” features offered free for research.
Best for: testing new reasoning tools without cost.
Low‑cost reasoning with solid math skills.
Best for: education tools and research helpers.
Real‑time information and trend awareness.
Best for: media, marketing, and social apps.
Open‑source model with robust fundamentals and community support.
Best for: custom projects and OSS ecosystems.
Reliable multimodal model with strong latency and quality.
Best for: apps where speed and vision/voice matter.
Research access to a massive 2M‑token context window.
Best for: research and legal document testing.
Strong reasoning for its size and price.
Best for: learning tools, analysis bots, and support systems.
Blazing speed and excellent cost efficiency.
Best for: bulk chat, moderation, and high‑volume workflows.
Distilled from a large model; strong at coding tasks.
Best for: developer tools and technical documentation.
Safe, polished long‑form writing and analysis.
Best for: reports, policy docs, and careful writing.
Fast and budget‑friendly for real‑time apps.
Best for: startups and live apps.
Balanced, with solid multimodal chops.
Best for: enterprise trials.
Fast research‑only version for prototyping.
Best for: school projects and prototypes.
Open‑source with a proven track record.
Best for: low‑cost coding help.
Strong multilingual performance.
Best for: Asian markets and enterprise apps.
Huge memory window for deep retrieval.
Best for: knowledge bases and long‑form QA.
Careful, ethical writing and analysis.
Best for: consulting, teaching, and compliance.
Strong live search and synthesis.
Best for: research, journalism, and business tracking.
Processes truly massive inputs like books or large codebases.
Best for: entire books, giant codebases, or case files.
Deeper web search with more detail.
Best for: professional research, strategy, and investigations.
Purpose‑built for question answering.
Best for: FAQs, help desks, and student quizzes.
Great for AWS‑native stacks and compliance needs.
Best for: cloud apps and regulated workloads.
Proven multimodal model with stable performance.
Best for: steady reliability across modalities.
If you’re unsure, start with Gemini 2.5 Flash (#34) for speed and cost, then pair a specialist like Claude 3.7 (#36) for careful long‑form work.
The lower half of the list shows a clear direction: faster, cheaper, and much larger contexts. Expect layered systems where a quick, low‑cost model handles easy steps and passes complex parts to a smarter one. Open source will keep expanding in coding, math, and multilingual support.
We used the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v2.2: a weighted blend of reasoning, math, coding, instruction following, and long‑context performance, plus practical signals like price and speed.
Yes. Many are faster and cheaper workhorses for production tasks or high‑volume workflows where top‑10 quality isn’t required.
Vendors often release experimental builds for research access. We include them for context but flag pricing or availability caveats where relevant.
Start with Gemini 2.5 Flash (#34) or Gemini 2.0 Flash (#37), then pair with a careful writer like Claude 3.7 Sonnet (#36) for the hard parts.